|
|
Post by Marcellus on Nov 15, 2013 9:59:00 GMT
A controversial topic to say the least, eh?
I'm a big fan of both, although I don't play anymore, as they're both such good games for different reasons. I won't go into depth, I'll leave that up to you guys!
Be nice!
|
|
|
|
Post by Daschundman on Nov 15, 2013 14:28:54 GMT
That's a really tough decision, they both have their goods and bad's. Battlefield is more realistic, but has less players. CoD has a lot more people, but not as realistic. In my opinion, I rather call of duty just because of the shear amount of people you can mess with, but it really depends in what mood you're in!
|
|
|
|
Post by Icarus on Nov 15, 2013 15:01:41 GMT
Call of Duty has the better gameplay and is more fun IMO, if that's where it's all about it would win. But it's not where it's all about.
Okay so lets begin here: Call of Duty has an enormous amount of bugs and is badly coded, the rate of fire for example, it's defined by the FPS you have (frames per second) not by time.
So when there is alot of smoke you shoot slower. then on PC there are an absolute shit amount of hackers and every lobby has one.
That gives it alot of min points. it's just a cheap game and every new year it's about the same. when you put MW3 on max settings, and when you pot Ghosts on max settings it looks excactly the same. Ghosts looks even slightly worse in my opinion. That makes it the game that loses from battlefield. this year they screwed up. right on the moment where they should've flamed. but they didn't COD is going to die in a few years, believe me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 15, 2013 17:30:55 GMT
For me , COD it's like an arcade game , you're in the game instantly you don't need to think instead of BF because you need to be strategic and stuffs like that... But I like both  |
|
|
|
Post by Marcellus on Nov 15, 2013 18:47:52 GMT
I wouldn't say CoD will die soon, only if they decide to phase it out...theres to many people who just enjoy picking a controller up and quickly killing some fools.
|
|
|
|
Post by Daschundman on Nov 15, 2013 19:47:42 GMT
I agree with Marcellus and Daiizin, CoD is more for the casual gamer that just wants to relax and not think too much, which is why it won't die out anytime soon (unlees they completely change it).
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandooo on Nov 15, 2013 20:40:13 GMT
Eh I think they're both fine. Its pointless to fight over it
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcellus on Nov 15, 2013 20:58:15 GMT
4 voters and we all voted 'Hard Decision' ahaha. Well done guys; keeping the peace!
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandooo on Nov 15, 2013 21:03:41 GMT
If anyone breaks the peace shit will hit the fan haha!
|
|
|
|
Post by Daschundman on Nov 15, 2013 22:39:10 GMT
I call turning on the fan hahaha!
|
|
|
|
Post by Daschundman on Nov 16, 2013 13:55:15 GMT
That's it Brandooo , you go grab the shit, I'll go grab the fan lol |
|
|
|
Post by Vikodo on Nov 17, 2013 17:04:27 GMT
As long as their is simple-minded people, there will be simple minded games like CoD. The new Battlefield isn't perfect, but I would rank it leagues above any CoD. (No offense to anyone who plays/enjoys CoD, but it's not like it's the hardest game to be good at.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brandooo on Nov 17, 2013 17:47:53 GMT
True
|
|
|
|
Post by ECPinoy on Jan 8, 2014 0:40:08 GMT
Putting my opinion (finally) about this topic
I've played COD: Ghosts and Battlefield 4
and I'm gonna be honest... COD:Ghosts sucked.
COD:Ghosts had too many invisible walls, you can't go anywhere other than where the story tells you to go.
Battlefield 4 had an okay campaign, but it was too short.
On to Multiplayer
Battlefield had an array of weapons, but got confusing pretty quickly
Ghosts had weapons, alot of them, but the most over-powered ones were usually the ones you get later on when you level up.
I would like to change my choice from "hard decision" to "Battlefield"
|
|
